LLM Serving: Ollama vs vLLM vs TGI
Compare vLLM vs SGLang vs Ollama vs TGI vs LocalAI for LLM serving
Choose the right LLM serving solution for your needs on CLORE.AI.
All options available on CLORE.AI Marketplace.
Quick Decision Guide
Multi-GPU 80GB-class rigs are not listed on the Clore.ai marketplace. The biggest boxes listed today are 4× RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (96GB each, 380GB total) and 8–11× RTX 5090 (32GB each). A100 / H200 / B200 capacity is sold as bare metal on request. Check GPU Pricing & Availability before sizing a deployment.
Quick testing & chat
Ollama
Easiest setup, fastest startup
Production API (max throughput)
SGLang or vLLM
Highest throughput in 2025
Reasoning models (DeepSeek-R1)
SGLang
Best support for reasoning chains
HuggingFace integration
TGI
Native HF support
Local development
Ollama
Works everywhere
High concurrency
SGLang or vLLM
Continuous batching
Multi-modal (TTS, STT, Embeddings)
LocalAI
All-in-one solution
Streaming apps
vLLM or SGLang
Both excellent
Startup Time Comparison
Ollama
30-60 seconds
Fastest, lightweight
SGLang
3-8 minutes
Downloads model from HF
vLLM
5-15 minutes
Downloads model from HF
TGI
3-10 minutes
Downloads model from HF
LocalAI
5-10 minutes
Pre-loads multiple models
Overview Comparison
Ease of Setup
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
⭐⭐⭐
⭐⭐⭐
⭐⭐⭐
⭐⭐⭐⭐
Performance
⭐⭐⭐
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
⭐⭐⭐⭐
⭐⭐⭐
Model Support
⭐⭐⭐⭐
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
⭐⭐⭐⭐
⭐⭐⭐⭐
API Compatibility
Custom + OpenAI
OpenAI
OpenAI
Custom + OpenAI
OpenAI
Multi-GPU
Limited
Excellent
Excellent
Good
Limited
Memory Efficiency
Good
Excellent
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Multi-Modal
Vision only
Vision only
Vision only
No
TTS, STT, Embed
Startup Time
30 sec
5-15 min
3-8 min
3-10 min
5-10 min
Reasoning Models
Limited
Good
Excellent
Good
Limited
Best For
Development
Production
Production + Reasoning
HF Ecosystem
Multi-modal
2025 Benchmarks: DeepSeek-R1-32B
TTFT, TPOT & Throughput (A100 80GB, batch=32, input=512, output=512)
SGLang v0.4
180
14
2,850
Best overall 2025
vLLM v0.7
240
17
2,400
Excellent, close to SGLang
llama.cpp
420
28
1,100
CPU+GPU, quantized
Ollama
510
35
820
Ease of use priority
TTFT = Time to First Token (latency). TPOT = Time Per Output Token. Lower is better for both.
Throughput Comparison (RTX 4090, Llama 3.1 8B, 10 concurrent users)
SGLang v0.4
920
20-30
Radix attention caching
vLLM v0.7
870
20-30
PagedAttention
TGI
550
10-20
Ollama
160*
—
Sequential by default
*Ollama serves requests sequentially by default
SGLang
Overview
SGLang (Structured Generation Language) is a high-throughput LLM serving framework developed by researchers from UC Berkeley and LMSYS. In 2025 benchmarks it frequently matches or exceeds vLLM — especially for reasoning models like DeepSeek-R1.
Pros
✅ Often fastest TTFT and throughput in 2025 benchmarks
✅ Radix attention for efficient KV-cache reuse
✅ Excellent support for reasoning models (DeepSeek-R1, QwQ)
✅ OpenAI-compatible API
✅ Continuous batching and prefix caching
✅ Speculative decoding support
✅ Multi-GPU tensor parallelism
Cons
❌ Newer ecosystem, fewer community resources than vLLM
❌ More complex setup than Ollama
❌ Linux-only
Quick Start
DeepSeek-R1 with SGLang
API Usage
Multi-GPU
Best For
🎯 Maximum throughput production APIs
🎯 Reasoning models (DeepSeek-R1, QwQ, o1-style)
🎯 Low-latency (TTFT) applications
🎯 Prefix-heavy workloads (high KV-cache reuse)
Ollama
Overview
Ollama is the easiest way to run LLMs locally. Perfect for development, testing, and personal use.
Pros
✅ One-command install and run
✅ Built-in model library
✅ Great CLI experience
✅ Works on Mac, Linux, Windows
✅ Automatic quantization
✅ Low resource overhead
Cons
❌ Lower throughput than alternatives
❌ Limited multi-GPU support
❌ Less production-ready
❌ Fewer optimization options
Quick Start
API Usage
OpenAI Compatibility
Performance
Llama 3.2 3B
RTX 3060
45-55
Llama 3.1 8B
RTX 3090
35-45
Llama 3.1 70B
A100 40GB
15-20
Best For
🎯 Quick prototyping
🎯 Personal AI assistant
🎯 Learning and experimentation
🎯 Simple deployments
vLLM
Overview
vLLM is a battle-tested high-throughput LLM inference engine for production. v0.7 (2025) brings improved performance, better quantization support, and new speculative decoding options.
Pros
✅ Highest throughput (continuous batching + PagedAttention)
✅ PagedAttention for efficient memory
✅ Excellent multi-GPU support
✅ OpenAI-compatible API
✅ Production-ready, large community
✅ Supports many quantization formats (AWQ, GPTQ, FP8)
✅ Speculative decoding in v0.7
Cons
❌ More complex setup
❌ Higher memory overhead at start
❌ Linux-only (no native Windows/Mac)
❌ Requires more configuration
Quick Start
Docker Deploy
API Usage
Multi-GPU
Performance
Llama 3.1 8B
RTX 3090
80-100
10-20
Llama 3.1 8B
RTX 4090
120-150
20-30
Llama 3.1 70B
A100 40GB
25-35
5-10
Llama 3.1 70B
2x A100
50-70
15-25
Best For
🎯 Production APIs with large community
🎯 High-traffic applications
🎯 Multi-user chat services
🎯 Maximum throughput needs
Text Generation Inference (TGI)
Overview
HuggingFace's production server, tightly integrated with the HF ecosystem.
Pros
✅ Native HuggingFace integration
✅ Great for HF models
✅ Good multi-GPU support
✅ Built-in safety features
✅ Prometheus metrics
✅ Well-documented
Cons
❌ Slightly lower throughput than vLLM/SGLang
❌ More resource intensive
❌ Complex configuration
❌ Longer startup times
Quick Start
Performance
Llama 3.1 8B
RTX 3090
60-80
8-15
Llama 3.1 8B
RTX 4090
90-120
15-25
Llama 3.1 70B
A100 40GB
20-30
3-8
Best For
🎯 HuggingFace model users
🎯 Research environments
🎯 Need built-in safety features
🎯 Prometheus monitoring needs
LocalAI
Overview
LocalAI is an OpenAI-compatible API that supports multiple modalities: LLMs, TTS, STT, embeddings, and image generation.
Pros
✅ Multi-modal support (LLM, TTS, STT, embeddings)
✅ Drop-in OpenAI replacement
✅ Pre-built models available
✅ Supports GGUF models
✅ Reranking support
✅ Swagger UI documentation
Cons
❌ Longer startup time (5-10 minutes)
❌ Lower LLM throughput than vLLM/SGLang
❌ Image generation may have CUDA issues
❌ More complex for pure LLM use
Quick Start
API Usage
Best For
🎯 Need multiple modalities (TTS, STT, LLM)
🎯 Want OpenAI API compatibility
🎯 Running GGUF models
🎯 Document reranking workflows
Performance Comparison (2025)
Throughput (tokens/second) — Single User
Llama 3.1 8B (RTX 3090)
40
90
100
70
Llama 3.1 8B (RTX 4090)
65
140
160
110
Llama 3.1 70B (A100 40GB)
18
30
35
25
Throughput — Multiple Users (10 concurrent)
Llama 3.1 8B (RTX 4090)
150*
800
920
500
Llama 3.1 70B (A100 40GB)
50*
200
240
150
*Ollama serves sequentially by default
Memory Usage
Llama 3.1 8B
5GB
6GB
6GB
7GB
Llama 3.1 70B (Q4)
38GB
40GB
39GB
42GB
Time to First Token (TTFT) — DeepSeek-R1-32B
SGLang v0.4
180ms
14ms
vLLM v0.7
240ms
17ms
llama.cpp
420ms
28ms
Ollama
510ms
35ms
Feature Comparison
OpenAI API
✅
✅
✅
✅
✅
Streaming
✅
✅
✅
✅
✅
Batching
Basic
Continuous
Continuous
Dynamic
Basic
Multi-GPU
Limited
Excellent
Excellent
Good
Limited
Quantization
GGUF
AWQ, GPTQ, FP8
AWQ, GPTQ, FP8
bitsandbytes, AWQ
GGUF
LoRA
✅
✅
✅
✅
✅
Speculative Decoding
❌
✅
✅
✅
❌
Prefix Caching
❌
✅
✅ (Radix)
✅
❌
Reasoning Models
Limited
Good
Excellent
Good
Limited
Metrics
Basic
Prometheus
Prometheus
Prometheus
Prometheus
Function Calling
✅
✅
✅
✅
✅
Vision Models
✅
✅
✅
✅
Limited
TTS
❌
❌
❌
❌
✅
STT
❌
❌
❌
❌
✅
Embeddings
✅
Limited
Limited
Limited
✅
When to Use What
Use Ollama When:
You want to get started in 5 minutes
You're prototyping or learning
You need a personal AI assistant
You're on Mac or Windows
Simplicity matters more than speed
Use SGLang When:
You need the absolute lowest latency (TTFT)
You're serving reasoning models (DeepSeek-R1, QwQ, o1-style)
You have workloads with heavy prefix sharing (RAG, system prompts)
You need top-tier throughput in 2025 benchmarks
You want cutting-edge optimizations (Radix attention)
Use vLLM When:
You need maximum throughput with a mature, well-supported framework
You're serving many users at scale
You need production reliability with a large community
You want OpenAI drop-in replacement
You have multi-GPU setups
You need broad model format support (AWQ, GPTQ, FP8)
Use TGI When:
You're in the HuggingFace ecosystem
You need built-in safety features
You want detailed Prometheus metrics
You need to serve HF models directly
You're in a research environment
Use LocalAI When:
You need TTS and STT alongside LLM
You want embeddings for RAG
You need document reranking
You want a single all-in-one solution
You're building voice-enabled apps
Migration Guide
From Ollama to SGLang
From vLLM to SGLang
Both support OpenAI API - just change the endpoint URL. APIs are fully compatible.
Recommendations by GPU
RTX 3060 12GB
Ollama
Ollama
Ollama
RTX 3090 24GB
Ollama
vLLM
SGLang
RTX 4090 24GB
SGLang/vLLM
SGLang/vLLM
SGLang
A100 40GB+
SGLang
SGLang
SGLang
Next Steps
Ollama Guide - Easiest setup
vLLM Guide - Highest throughput
LocalAI Guide - Multi-modal support
DeepSeek-R1 Guide - Reasoning models
Multi-GPU Setup - Scale to larger models
API Integration - Build applications
Last updated
Was this helpful?