Fine-tuning Tools Comparison

Choose the right fine-tuning framework for training LLMs on Clore.ai GPU servers.

circle-info

Fine-tuning adapts a pre-trained LLM to your specific task or domain. This guide compares the four leading open-source tools: Unsloth, Axolotl, LLaMA-Factory, and TRL — covering speed, memory efficiency, supported models, and ease of use.


Quick Decision Matrix

Unsloth
Axolotl
LLaMA-Factory
TRL

Best for

Speed + memory

Config-driven training

Beginner-friendly

Research + RLHF

Speed vs baseline

2-5× faster

~1× (standard)

~1× (standard)

~1× (standard)

Memory reduction

70-80% less

QLoRA standard

QLoRA standard

Standard

RLHF/DPO/PPO

Basic

✅ (native)

WebUI

GitHub stars

23K+

9K+

37K+

10K+

License

LGPL (free for non-commercial)

Apache 2.0

Apache 2.0

Apache 2.0


Overview

Unsloth

Unsloth is laser-focused on one thing: making fine-tuning as fast and memory-efficient as possible. It rewrites key operations in Triton and optimizes CUDA kernels.

Philosophy: Maximum speed, minimum VRAM — no compromises.

Axolotl

Axolotl wraps HuggingFace Transformers with a YAML-based configuration system. It handles the complexity of training setup so you can focus on data and hyperparameters.

Philosophy: Everything in YAML, full flexibility underneath.

LLaMA-Factory

LLaMA-Factory supports the widest range of models (100+) and training methods, with a web UI for configuration. It's the most accessible option for non-researchers.

Philosophy: Everything works, for everyone.

TRL (Transformer Reinforcement Learning)

TRL is HuggingFace's official RLHF library. It's the standard for PPO, DPO, ORPO, and other alignment training methods.

Philosophy: Research-first, alignment training native.


Speed Benchmarks

Training Speed Comparison (tokens/second)

Test setup: LLaMA 3.1 8B, LoRA r=16, 4-bit quantization, batch size 4, A100 80GB

Tool
Tokens/sec
vs Baseline
Memory (VRAM)

Unsloth (4-bit)

~4,200

2.8×

~8GB

Axolotl (QLoRA)

~1,500

1.0×

~16GB

LLaMA-Factory (QLoRA)

~1,480

~1.0×

~16GB

TRL (QLoRA)

~1,450

~0.97×

~18GB

Unsloth (full 16-bit)

~2,800

1.9×

~22GB

circle-check

VRAM Usage Comparison

Training LLaMA 3.1 8B, sequence length 2048:

Method
Unsloth
Axolotl
LLaMA-Factory
TRL

Full fine-tune (bf16)

60GB

70GB

72GB

74GB

LoRA (bf16)

18GB

24GB

25GB

26GB

QLoRA (4-bit)

8GB

16GB

16GB

18GB

QLoRA (4-bit, long ctx)

12GB

24GB

24GB

26GB

Minimum GPU for 8B model:

  • Unsloth: RTX 3080 (10GB) ✅

  • Others: RTX 3090 (24GB) required


Supported Models

Model Support Matrix

Model Family
Unsloth
Axolotl
LLaMA-Factory
TRL

LLaMA 3.x

LLaMA 2

Mistral

Mixtral MoE

Gemma 2

Phi-3/3.5

Qwen 2.5

DeepSeek

Falcon

GPT-NeoX

Partial

T5/FLAN

BERT/RoBERTa

Vision LLMs

Partial

Partial

Training Method Support

Method
Unsloth
Axolotl
LLaMA-Factory
TRL

Full fine-tune

LoRA

QLoRA

DoRA

PEFT

SFT

✅ (native)

DPO

✅ (native)

PPO

✅ (native)

ORPO

KTO

✅ (native)

GRPO

CPT (continued pretraining)


Unsloth: Deep Dive

What Makes It Fast

  1. Triton kernels: Rewrites Flash Attention, cross-entropy loss, and LoRA in Triton

  2. Fused operations: Combines multiple CUDA ops into one kernel

  3. Smart gradient checkpointing: "unsloth" mode saves ~30% more memory

  4. Efficient backprop: Avoids materializing large intermediate tensors

Installation on Clore.ai

Complete Training Script

Weaknesses: No PPO, limited to supported model list, LGPL license (check for commercial use)


Axolotl: Deep Dive

Configuration-First Approach

Axolotl shines when you want reproducible, version-controlled training configurations:

Best for: Teams that want reproducible, config-versioned training runs


LLaMA-Factory: Deep Dive

WebUI Walkthrough

WebUI tabs:

  1. Train — configure base model, dataset, method

  2. Evaluate — run MMLU, CMMLU benchmarks

  3. Chat — interactive inference

  4. Export — merge LoRA, quantize to GGUF

CLI Training Example

Best for: Beginners, teams wanting WebUI, DPO/RLHF without deep research knowledge


TRL: Deep Dive

RLHF Pipeline Example

TRL is the go-to for alignment training:

Best for: Alignment research, RLHF, DPO, PPO, ORPO implementations


Choosing the Right Tool

Decision Flow

By Team Type

Team
Recommendation
Reason

Individual researcher

Unsloth

Speed + Jupyter notebooks

ML engineer

Axolotl

Config-driven, reproducible

Product team

LLaMA-Factory

WebUI, wide model support

Alignment team

TRL

Native RLHF primitives

Startup

Unsloth + TRL

Speed + alignment when needed


Clore.ai GPU Recommendations

Task
Min GPU
Recommended
Tool

7-8B LoRA (QLoRA)

RTX 3080 (10GB)

RTX 3090

Unsloth

13B LoRA

RTX 3090 (24GB)

A6000 (48GB)

Unsloth/Axolotl

70B LoRA

A100 (80GB)

2×A100

Axolotl/TRL

8B Full FT

A100 (40GB)

A100 (80GB)

Any

DPO/PPO 7B

RTX 4090 (24GB)

A6000 (48GB)

TRL



Summary

Tool
Best for
Key advantage

Unsloth

Speed-critical training, small GPUs

2-5× faster, 70% less VRAM

Axolotl

Config-driven, reproducible runs

YAML-first, many data formats

LLaMA-Factory

100+ models, WebUI, beginners

Most model support, GUI

TRL

RLHF, DPO, alignment research

Native alignment training

For most Clore.ai use cases: start with Unsloth (speed + memory efficiency), add TRL if you need DPO or PPO alignment training.

Last updated

Was this helpful?